Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo X300 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 48/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 75/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 39 points higher (87/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (81/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 75/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (81/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 39 points (87/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.