Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo T4R
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo T4R (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo T4R leads — 35/100 vs 30/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T4R has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T4R doesn't; the Vivo T4R is noticeably lighter (183g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo T4R
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 183g vs 199g
- Higher performance (4/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (49/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (71/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo T4R, the Vivo T4R scores 5 points higher (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo T4R and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo T4R notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (71/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo T4R | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 956756 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.3×76.7×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 183 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo T4R
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo T4R
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T4R
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo T4R and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo T4R is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo T4R notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (71/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T4R?
The Vivo T4R edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo T4R?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo T4R — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T4R?
The Vivo T4R leads on camera score (34/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo T4R?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T4R is a better fit for everyday use.