Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo S16 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo S16 Pro (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16 Pro leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4600); the Vivo S16 Pro is noticeably lighter (182g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo S16 Pro
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Lighter: 182g vs 199g
- Higher performance (10/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo S16 Pro, the Vivo S16 Pro scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 Pro leads (10/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 Pro leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 Pro is a bit better (10/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 Pro is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo S16 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo S16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1221748 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1230 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3297 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, Origin OS 3 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S16 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo S16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo S16 Pro is a bit better (10/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 Pro is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo S16 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Vivo S16 Pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo S16 Pro — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Vivo S16 Pro leads on camera score (41/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Vivo S16 Pro leads on performance (10/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo S16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.