Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO Z9s
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO Z9s (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z9s leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z9s has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z9s doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z9s is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO Z9s
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (49/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO Z9s, the Vivo iQOO Z9s scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (75/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO Z9s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.7×75.0×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z9s
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9s
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9s
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s is a bit better (49/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9s notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (75/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO Z9s?
The Vivo iQOO Z9s edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO Z9s?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9s — 33/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO Z9s?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z9s is a better fit for everyday use.