Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO U5
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO U5 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 29/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO U5 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO U5 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO U5
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 185g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO U5, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 1 points higher (30/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO U5 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO U5 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO U5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2003 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 for iQOO | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.0×75.8×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 185 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO U5
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO U5
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO U5
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO U5 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO U5 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO U5?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Vivo iQOO U5 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO U5?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO U5 — 29/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO U5?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO U5 is a better fit for everyday use.