Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Pova Slim
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Pova Slim (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Slim leads — 32/100 vs 30/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Slim has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 4800); the Tecno Pova Slim is noticeably lighter (156g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Pova Slim
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 156g vs 199g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Pova Slim, the Tecno Pova Slim scores 2 points higher (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Pova Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6400 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 550018 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 803 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5160 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, HIOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.2×75.9×6.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 156 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Slim
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Slim
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Slim are nearly equal (27/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Slim and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pova Slim significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Tecno Pova Slim edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Pova Slim — 32/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Pova Slim?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Pova Slim is a better fit for everyday use.