Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy F15
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy F15 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 24/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy F15 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy F15 doesn't; the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy F15
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 217g
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 28/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better camera (28/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Samsung Galaxy F15, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 6 points higher (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F15 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy F15 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (51/100 vs 28/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy F15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | |
| AnTuTu | — | 513809 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 689 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1884 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, One UI 6 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 160.1×76.8×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 217 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy F15
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy F15
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy F15
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy F15 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (28/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy F15 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F15 (51/100 vs 28/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy F15?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Samsung Galaxy F15 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy F15?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy F15 — 24/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy F15?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy F15 is a better fit for everyday use.