Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy A23
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy A23 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 24/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A23 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 19/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Samsung Galaxy A23, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 6 points higher (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A23 leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A23 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (27/100 vs 19/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A23 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A23 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy A23 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 421228 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 412 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1410 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2408x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 70 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.5×76.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $219 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A23
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A23
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A23 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (27/100 vs 19/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A23 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A23 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy A23?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Samsung Galaxy A23 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy A23?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy A23 — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy A23?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy A23?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.