Honor X40 GT Racing vs Realme Narzo 90X
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Realme Narzo 90X (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Narzo 90X leads — 31/100 vs 30/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 90X has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 90X doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Realme Narzo 90X
- Faster charging: 66W vs 60W
- Lighter: 199g vs 212g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 35/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Realme Narzo 90X, the Realme Narzo 90X scores 1 points higher (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 90X leads (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 90X are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 90X notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 90X (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Realme Narzo 90X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1570 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 60W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 166.1×77.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 212 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 90X
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme Narzo 90X
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 90X
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 90X are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 90X notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (60/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 90X (51/100 vs 35/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Realme Narzo 90X?
The Realme Narzo 90X edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 90X?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Realme Narzo 90X — 31/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Realme Narzo 90X?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo 90X is a better fit for everyday use.