Honor X40 GT Racing vs Realme Narzo 70 Turbo
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo leads — 31/100 vs 30/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Realme Narzo 70 Turbo
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 185g vs 199g
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo scores 1 points higher (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Realme Narzo 70 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 161.7×74.7×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 185 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 70 Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme Narzo 70 Turbo
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 70 Turbo
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 27/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (68/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo?
The Realme Narzo 70 Turbo edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo — 31/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Realme Narzo 70 Turbo?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo 70 Turbo is a better fit for everyday use.