Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo Reno13 F 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo Reno13 F 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G leads — 34/100 vs 30/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno13 F 4G has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5800 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo Reno13 F 4G, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G scores 4 points higher (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo Reno13 F 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G100 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5800 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.2×75.1×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno13 F 4G?
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno13 F 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno13 F 4G?
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo Reno13 F 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a better fit for everyday use.