Honor X40 GT Racing vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 48/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 48/100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 75/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 38 points higher (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (83/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | $661 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 75/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (94/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (83/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 38 points (86/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.