Honor X40 GT Racing vs Nokia C02
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Nokia C02 (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 5/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 5 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C02 doesn't; the Honor X40 GT Racing is thinner (8.5mm vs 10.0mm).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Nokia C02
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 191g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Nokia C02, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 25 points higher (30/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Nokia C02 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc SC9832E | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 191 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (43/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Nokia C02?
The Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 25 points (30/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Nokia C02?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Nokia C02 — 5/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Nokia C02?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Nokia C02?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use.