Honor 600e vs Nokia C02
The Honor 600e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite, while the Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600e leads — 37/100 vs 5/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600e has the bigger battery (6520 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 5 MP; the Honor 600e has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C02 doesn't; the Honor 600e is thinner (7.3mm vs 10.0mm).
Honor 600e
Nokia C02
- Bigger battery: 6520 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 5MP
- Lighter: 180g vs 191g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 61/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 5/100
Comparing the Honor 600e vs the Nokia C02, the Honor 600e scores 32 points higher (37/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600e leads (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600e leads (54/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600e leads (72/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (40/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (54/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 600e is a bit better (75/100 vs 61/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (72/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 600e | Nokia C02 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite | Unisoc SC9832E | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1200x2600 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6520 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 5 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP66 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.4×75.4×7.3 mm | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 191 g | |
| Price | $550 | — |
Honor 600e
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Honor 600e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 600e
- 6520 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Nokia C02
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (40/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (54/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 600e is a bit better (75/100 vs 61/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C02 (72/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 600e or the Nokia C02?
The Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 32 points (37/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 600e and the Nokia C02?
The Honor 600e has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Nokia C02 — 5/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600e or the Nokia C02?
The Honor 600e leads on camera score (40/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600e over the Nokia C02?
The Honor 600e is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use.