Honor X40 GT Racing vs Tecno Tecno Camon 16
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 (2020) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 19/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Tecno Tecno Camon 16
- Lighter: 199g vs 207g
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 41/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Tecno Tecno Camon 16, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 11 points higher (30/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Tecno Tecno Camon 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio G70 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 317084 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 417 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1345 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1640 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 10, HIOS 6.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 207 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Tecno Camon 16
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Tecno Camon 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Tecno Camon 16
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Tecno Camon 16?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Tecno Tecno Camon 16?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 — 19/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Tecno Tecno Camon 16?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Tecno Tecno Camon 16?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 is a better fit for everyday use.