Honor Magic9 Super vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 68/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 2,000,659); the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is noticeably lighter (190g vs 227g).

The Honor Magic9 Super is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic9 Super

Performance 99
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 91
Portability 41
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Performance 80
Display 79
Camera 56
Battery 50
Portability 71
Value for money 50

What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 2000659
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 11000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (91/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 FE better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 227g

  • Better portability (71/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 19 points higher (87/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (71/100 vs 41/100).

Honor Magic9 Super: The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic9 Super Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Samsung Exynos 2400
AnTuTu 4290399 2000659
Geekbench Single 3639 2115
Geekbench Multi 11047 6826
Display 6.8" OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1280x2788 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 11000 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 80W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 118
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 17 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 10000 nits 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69K IP68
Dimensions 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm 161.3×76.6×7.4 mm
Weight 227 g 190 g
Launch price — $599

Camera comparison

Honor Magic9 Super

  • Main: 200MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
78
camera

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
56
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic9 Super

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2788
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic9 Super

  • 11000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
91
battery

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
50
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic9 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100
4290399 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
68/100 -114.4%
2000659 AnTuTu

Honor Magic9 Super leads Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 114.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic9 Super

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

$599

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (99/100 vs 80/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (78/100 vs 56/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (91/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (71/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?

The Honor Magic9 Super is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?

The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — 68/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?

The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 56/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?

The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 80/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?

The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.