Honor Magic8 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic8 Lite (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $299 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 57/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 969,048); the Honor Magic8 Lite is noticeably lighter (185g vs 230g).
Honor Magic8 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 185g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $950
- Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 969048
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1071
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3057
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5300 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic8 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 34 points higher (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Honor Magic8 Lite — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic8 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 969048 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1071 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3057 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $299 | $950 |
Honor Magic8 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic8 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic8 Lite
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic8 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic8 Lite by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $651. Honor Magic8 Lite was $651 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite (99/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite (85/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic8 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic8 Lite by 34 points (91/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic8 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic8 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic8 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.