Honor Magic7 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 71/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,433 vs 1,294,871); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3014433 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5270 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 68/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 223g
- Better camera (86/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 11 points higher (82/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (86/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3014433 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 132.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (91/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (86/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (80/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 79/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.