Honor Magic7 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 85/100 vs 71/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5850 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 223g).
Honor Magic7 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 5850 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 223g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 14 points higher (85/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (82/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (82/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 141.6% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (82/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 85/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.