Honor Magic7 Pro vs ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 73/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,433 vs 1,420,808); the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7 Pro
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3014433 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 5270 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 56/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 50 Ultra better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 223g
- Better camera (86/100 vs 79/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 9 points higher (82/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (50/100 vs 36/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3014433 | 1420808 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 161.8×73.1×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 Pro leads ZTE Axon 50 Ultra by 112.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (50/100 vs 36/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro edges out the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 79/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.