Honor Magic V3 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Honor Magic V3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $67 and $834. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 76/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5150); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,388,314); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 137); the Honor Magic V3 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.0mm).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Magic V3 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V3
Performance 83
Display 80
Camera 70
Battery 71
Portability 59
Value for money 100
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Honor Magic V3 better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Cheaper: $67 vs $834

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 86/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2388314
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 7192
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5150 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic V3 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 11 points higher (87/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 71/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic V3 leads (100/100 vs 86/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic V3 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic V3 (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V3 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic V3 is a bit better (100/100 vs 86/100).

Honor Magic V3: The Honor Magic V3 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic V3 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2388314 3269794
Geekbench Single 2205 3228
Geekbench Multi 7192 9553
Display 7.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2156x2344 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5150 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 66W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 137 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 40 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, MagicOS 8.0.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 156.6×145.3×4.3 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 226 g 226 g
Price $67 $834
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V3
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 40MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
70
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic V3
  • 7.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2156x2344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V3
  • 5150 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • Wireless: 50W
71
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic V3 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic V3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
76/100
2388314 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +27.0%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic V3 by 27.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Honor Magic V3
$67
Vivo X300 Pro
$834

Price difference: $767. Honor Magic V3 is cheaper by $767.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic V3 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic V3 (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 71/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V3 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic V3 is a bit better (100/100 vs 86/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V3 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Magic V3 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic V3 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor Magic V3 has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V3 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V3 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic V3 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor Magic V3 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.