Honor Magic 7 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Honor Magic 7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 71/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic 7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor Magic 7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,018,146 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 223g).
Honor Magic 7 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 3018146 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 5270 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 223g
- Better camera (86/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic 7 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Honor Magic 7 Pro scores 11 points higher (82/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (86/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic 7 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3018146 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3057 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9302 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5270 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 148 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Honor Magic 7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor Magic 7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic 7 Pro
- 5270 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic 7 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic 7 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 133.8% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (91/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (86/100 vs 79/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (80/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (52/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic 7 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 79/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic 7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic 7 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.