Tecno Pova 7 Neo vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Tecno Pova 7 Neo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 48/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 561,891).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Neo better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 56/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 561891
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2014
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 204g vs 210g
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 7 Neo vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 23 points higher (71/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo leads (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (68/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (80/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Tecno Pova 7 Neo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 7 Neo | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 561891 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2014 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $140 | — |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 7 Neo
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 7 Neo and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Tecno Pova 7 Neo by 56.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (68/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (80/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo (86/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Neo notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (71/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Tecno Pova 7 Neo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Neo by 23 points (71/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 7 Neo and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Tecno Pova 7 Neo has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 7 Neo or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 7 Neo over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.