Honor Magic7 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 leads — 78/100 vs 71/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 has the bigger battery (5650 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor Magic7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,290,942).
Honor Magic7
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 5650 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 52/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Honor Magic7 scores 7 points higher (78/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1256 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5650 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $550 | — |
Honor Magic7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor Magic7
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1256
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7
- 5650 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 141.6% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (92/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 (86/100 vs 56/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 56/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 leads on performance (92/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.