Honor 90 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 90 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $400 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 61/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 912,649); the Honor 90 is noticeably lighter (183g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 90
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor 90 better?
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 183g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $400 vs $2899
- Better camera (59/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (71/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 912649
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1110
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3067
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 90 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 8 points higher (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Honor 90 — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 90 (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 90 is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 90 is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 90 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 90 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 912649 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1110 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3067 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 122 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×74.1×7.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 183 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $400 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 90
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 90
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 90
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 90 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 90 by 68.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2499. Honor 90 was $2499 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 90 (90/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 90 is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 90 is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 90 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 90 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Honor 90 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 90 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 90 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 90 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 90 leads on camera score (59/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 90 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Honor 90 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.