Honor 600 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 600 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads — 79/100 vs 69/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5600); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,120,347); the Honor 600 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (202g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor 600 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 202g vs 309g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 77/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600 Pro (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor 600 Pro (China) scores 10 points higher (79/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads (86/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro (China) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2728 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 156.1×74.8×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2728
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 600 Pro (China) and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 600 Pro (China) by 27.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (86/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (59/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Pro (China) over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.