Honor 600 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor 600 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads — 79/100 vs 74/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,120,347); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 7.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 600 Pro (China)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor 600 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (78/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Lighter: 201g vs 202g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 600 Pro (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Honor 600 Pro (China) scores 5 points higher (79/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) leads (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (74/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro (China) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2728 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 156.1×74.8×7.9 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2728
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 600 Pro (China)
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 600 Pro (China) and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor 600 Pro (China) by 46.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (98/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (78/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 600 Pro (China) (74/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) leads on camera score (78/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 Pro (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Pro (China) over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 600 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.