Honor 400 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 400 (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $449 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 63/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5300); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,087,525); the Honor 400 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor 400 better?
- Lighter: 184g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $899
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1087525
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3111
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5300 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 25 points higher (88/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Honor 400 — 50/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 400 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 400 (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (76/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1087525 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 156.5×74.6×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $449 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2736
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 400 by 67.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $450. Honor 400 was $450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (94/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 400 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 400 (81/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (76/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 by 25 points (88/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 400 has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.