Honor 400 Smart vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Honor 400 Smart (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 46/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 6500); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 617,626); the Honor 400 Smart is noticeably lighter (189g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Smart
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Honor 400 Smart better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 224g
- Better portability (61/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 617626
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 938
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2183
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 35W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Smart vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 41 points higher (87/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (98/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (61/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 617626 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 938 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2183 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.4 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | — | $892 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Smart
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Smart
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Smart
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Smart and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Honor 400 Smart by 84.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 400 Smart
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (98/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart (83/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (61/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart by 41 points (87/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Honor 400 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Smart or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Smart or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.