Honor 400 Smart 4G vs Poco M7
The Honor 400 Smart 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Poco M7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco M7 leads — 43/100 vs 42/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 400 Smart 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M7 doesn't; the Honor 400 Smart 4G is noticeably lighter (208g vs 224g).
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Poco M7
- Faster charging: 35W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 208g vs 224g
- Better camera (39/100 vs 30/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (74/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor 400 Smart 4G vs the Poco M7, the Poco M7 scores 1 points higher (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 33/100. In the "display" category, the Poco M7 notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (74/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (39/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 and the Honor 400 Smart 4G are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart 4G | Poco M7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | 467392 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | — | $110 |
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco M7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco M7
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Poco M7
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 400 Smart 4G and Poco M7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 33/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco M7 notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (74/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (39/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 and the Honor 400 Smart 4G are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Poco M7?
The Poco M7 edges out the Honor 400 Smart 4G by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Poco M7?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Poco M7 — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Poco M7?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G leads on camera score (39/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart 4G over the Poco M7?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco M7 is a better fit for everyday use.