Honor 400 Smart 4G vs Realme C67
The Honor 400 Smart 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Realme C67 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 400 Smart 4G leads — 43/100 vs 41/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 400 Smart 4G has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Honor 400 Smart 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme C67 doesn't; the Realme C67 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 208g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Realme C67
What makes Honor 400 Smart 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 35W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (55/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Realme C67 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 208g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Smart 4G vs the Realme C67, the Honor 400 Smart 4G scores 2 points higher (43/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Realme C67 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C67 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart 4G | Realme C67 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 476175 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 680 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 165.7×76.0×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $170 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Realme C67
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme C67
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Realme C67
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Smart 4G and Realme C67, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 34/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Realme C67 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C67 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Realme C67?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G edges out the Realme C67 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Realme C67?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Realme C67 — 41/100.
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart 4G over the Realme C67?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Realme C67 (65/100 vs 52/100).