Honor 400 Smart 4G vs Poco F7
The Honor 400 Smart 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 leads — 66/100 vs 42/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,205,289 vs 467,392).
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Poco F7
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 208g vs 215g
- Better camera (39/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 48/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2205289 vs 467392
- Better Geekbench Single: 2070 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6694 vs 1396
- Faster charging: 90W vs 35W
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor 400 Smart 4G vs the Poco F7, the Poco F7 scores 24 points higher (66/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 leads (81/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (81/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart 4G | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | 2205289 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $399 |
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 400 Smart 4G and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 leads Honor 400 Smart 4G by 78.8% in our overall performance rating.
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (81/100 vs 33/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (83/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G by 24 points (66/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Poco F7?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Poco F7?
The Poco F7 leads on performance (81/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart 4G over the Poco F7?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.