Honor 300 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor 300 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $580 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 76/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 300 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,237,843); the Honor 300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (198g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 300 Ultra
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Honor 300 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 50W
- Lighter: 198g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $580 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2237843
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 6511
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 300 Ultra vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 7 points higher (83/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Honor 300 Ultra — 68/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor 300 Ultra (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 300 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 300 Ultra | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2237843 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×75.3×8.2 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $580 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Honor 300 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 300 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 300 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 300 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor 300 Ultra by 26.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1219. Honor 300 Ultra was $1219 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor 300 Ultra (91/100 vs 66/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 300 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Honor 300 Ultra by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor 300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 66/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor 300 Ultra over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor 300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.