Honor 300 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
The Honor 300 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $580 and $1099. Both devices score the same overall rating of 76/100. Key differences: the Honor 300 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 2,237,843).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 300 Ultra
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
What makes Honor 300 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 30W
- Lighter: 198g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $580 vs $1099
- Better camera (66/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 2237843
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
The Honor 300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra received the same MobileRank rating — 76/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Honor 300 Ultra — 68/100, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 300 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 300 Ultra | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2237843 | 2962094 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×75.3×8.2 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $580 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
Honor 300 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 300 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 300 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 300 Ultra and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Honor 300 Ultra by 24.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $519. Honor 300 Ultra was $519 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 300 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (80/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
Both devices scored 76/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 82/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 300 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor 300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor 300 Ultra leads on camera score (66/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 300 Ultra or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor 300 Ultra over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor 300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.