Honor 300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 300 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $470 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 300 Pro leads — 76/100 vs 69/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,508,188); the Honor 300 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor 300 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $470 vs $2899
- Better camera (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2508188
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 300 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor 300 Pro scores 7 points higher (76/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 300 Pro leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Pro leads (80/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor 300 Pro — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 300 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 300 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 300 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2508188 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×75.3×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $470 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 300 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 300 Pro
- 5300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 300 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 300 Pro by 14.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2429. Honor 300 Pro was $2429 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 300 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 300 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 300 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 300 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 300 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 300 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 300 Pro leads on camera score (66/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 300 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Honor 300 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.