Honor 200 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $399 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 65/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,002,480); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 130); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 226g).
Honor 200
Vivo X300 Pro
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 187g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $899
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2967
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 22 points higher (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Honor 200 — 68/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (81/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2967 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $899 |
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 200 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 200 by 69.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Honor 200 was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (93/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (81/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 200 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.