Honor 200 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $399 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 65/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,002,480); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 130); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor 200 better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 187g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $899
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3111
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 23 points higher (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Honor 200 — 58/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (81/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 200 by 69.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Honor 200 was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (94/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (81/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.