Honor 200 Smart vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 200 Smart (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 40/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 568,395); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 55); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor 200 Smart doesn't; the Honor 200 Smart is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Smart
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Honor 200 Smart better?
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 568395
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2115
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 7/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Smart vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 48 points higher (88/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (94/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (84/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (96/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Smart notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Smart | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 55 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Smart
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Smart
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Smart
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Smart and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 200 Smart by 82.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 200 Smart
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (94/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (84/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (96/100 vs 7/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (81/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Smart notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart by 48 points (88/100 vs 40/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Smart and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 200 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 7/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Smart or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Smart over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.