Honor 200 Smart vs Nokia XR30
The Honor 200 Smart (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 41/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 Smart has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Nokia XR30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 560,863); the Nokia XR30 has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor 200 Smart doesn't.
Honor 200 Smart
Nokia XR30
- Better Geekbench Single: 923 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2249 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 35W vs 33W
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 560863
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 7/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Smart vs the Nokia XR30, the Nokia XR30 scores 5 points higher (46/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Smart leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 200 Smart and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Honor 200 Smart are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (43/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Smart | Nokia XR30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | |
| AnTuTu | 560863 | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 923 | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2249 | 2003 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 33W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 55 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.1 mm | — | |
| Weight | 191 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Honor 200 Smart
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor 200 Smart
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 200 Smart
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 200 Smart and Nokia XR30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia XR30 leads Honor 200 Smart by 5.3% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 200 Smart and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Honor 200 Smart are nearly equal (66/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Smart (43/100 vs 7/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Smart or the Nokia XR30?
The Nokia XR30 edges out the Honor 200 Smart by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Smart and the Nokia XR30?
The Honor 200 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Nokia XR30 — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Smart or the Nokia XR30?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 7/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Smart over the Nokia XR30?
The Honor 200 Smart is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use.