HMD Crest vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The HMD Crest (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 50/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 628,581); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the HMD Crest doesn't; the HMD Crest is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
HMD Crest
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes HMD Crest better?
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Better display (81/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 735
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2318
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the HMD Crest vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 19 points higher (69/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the HMD Crest (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the HMD Crest is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the HMD Crest (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the HMD Crest significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | HMD Crest | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 735 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2318 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×76.4×8.4 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
HMD Crest
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
HMD Crest
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
HMD Crest
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared HMD Crest and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads HMD Crest by 78.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
HMD Crest
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the HMD Crest (90/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the HMD Crest is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the HMD Crest (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the HMD Crest significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the HMD Crest or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the HMD Crest — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the HMD Crest and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The HMD Crest has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the HMD Crest or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the HMD Crest or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the HMD Crest over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.