Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $1799 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 65/100 vs 64/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 108 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,673,316 vs 1,401,321); the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (209g vs 257g).

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

Performance 69
Display 94
Camera 43
Battery 72
Portability 44
Value for money 68

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 1707 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4431 vs 4313

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (64/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1673316 vs 1401321
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 7W
  • Lighter: 209g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 1 points higher (65/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (72/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra: The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G4 Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
AnTuTu 1401321 1673316
Geekbench Single 1707 1398
Geekbench Multi 4431 4313
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 21W 70W
Wireless charging 7W 30W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 15 / HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP64
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm
Weight 257 g 209 g
Launch price $1799 $300

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • Wireless: 30W
72
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100 +16.3%
1673316 AnTuTu

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 16.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

$300

Launch price difference: $1499. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $1499 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra are nearly equal (70/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (64/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (72/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on camera score (64/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.