Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $1799 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 73/100 vs 64/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is faster in AnTuTu (1,724,757 vs 1,401,321); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 257g).

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 66
Value for money 70

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 1707 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4431 vs 4313

  • Overall rating 64/100

What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1724757 vs 1401321
  • Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 193g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $1799

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 52/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 9 points higher (73/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (56/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 70/100. In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Tecno Camon 40 Premier: The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 8350
AnTuTu 1401321 1724757
Geekbench Single 1707 1398
Geekbench Multi 4431 4313
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 5100 mAh
Charging 21W 70W
Wireless charging 7W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 —
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm
Weight 257 g 193 g
Launch price $1799 $450

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 40 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8350
73/100 +18.8%
1724757 AnTuTu

Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 18.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Tecno Camon 40 Premier

$450

Launch price difference: $1349. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $1349 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 70/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.