Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs OPPO Reno16 Pro
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super; launch prices were $1799 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 64/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,401,321); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 257g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
OPPO Reno16 Pro
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 1707 vs 1555
- Overall rating 64/100
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 4431
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 257g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1799
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 19 points higher (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (66/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | OPPO Reno16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1707 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4431 | 6405 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $600 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 54.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1199. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (66/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.