Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1799 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 39/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,401,321); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 129); the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is noticeably lighter (257g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 38 points (77/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Performance 20
Display 100
Camera 64
Battery 29
Design 0
Value for money 0
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
  • Lighter: 257g vs 285g

  • Overall rating 39/100
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1401321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4516
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 20/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 29/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 38 points higher (77/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (92/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (51/100 vs 29/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1401321 3942923
Geekbench Single 1750 3640
Geekbench Multi 4516 11033
Display 8.0" AMOLED 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 21W 68W
Wireless charging 7W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 129 164
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 10 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IPX9
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 257 g 285 g
Price $1799 $1799
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
29
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
39/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100 +64.5%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 64.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
$1799
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Price difference: $0. Same price.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (92/100 vs 20/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (91/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (51/100 vs 29/100).

design

In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 38 points (77/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 20/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.