Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs OPPO Reno16 Pro
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super; launch prices were $1799 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 61/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,553,009); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 258g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
OPPO Reno16 Pro
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 1555
- Overall rating 61/100
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1553009
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 6173
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5015 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 258g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $1799
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the OPPO Reno16 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 22 points higher (83/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — 30/100, OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold | OPPO Reno16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G5 | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | |
| AnTuTu | 1553009 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2276 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6173 | 6405 | |
| Display | 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED | 6.3" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2152x2076 | 1216x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5015 mAh | 6700 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 258 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $600 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2152x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
- 5015 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and OPPO Reno16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 49.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1199. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $1199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 22 points (83/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the OPPO Reno16 Pro — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the OPPO Reno16 Pro?
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.