Fairphone 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Fairphone 5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm QCM6490, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 47/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Fairphone 5 is noticeably lighter (212g vs 309g).
Fairphone 5
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 212g vs 309g
- Better display (72/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (36/100 vs 20/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (52/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 28/100)
Comparing the Fairphone 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 22 points higher (69/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 28/100). In the "display" category, the Fairphone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (72/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Fairphone 5 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 5 (63/100 vs 28/100). In the "portability" category, the Fairphone 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (36/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Fairphone 5 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm QCM6490 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.5" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 108 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, up to 5 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 880 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP55 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×75.8×9.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Fairphone 5
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Fairphone 5
- 6.5" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Fairphone 5
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Fairphone 5
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Fairphone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (72/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Fairphone 5 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 5 (63/100 vs 28/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Fairphone 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (36/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Fairphone 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 5 by 22 points (69/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Fairphone 5 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Should you choose the Fairphone 5 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Fairphone 5 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.