Fairphone 3+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $489 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 13/100 (a 74-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 243,691); the Fairphone 3+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Fairphone 3+
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $489 vs $950
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 12/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 44/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 243691
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 295
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1037
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3040 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 74 points higher (87/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ leads (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (96/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (96/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | 11033 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $489 | $950 |
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Fairphone 3+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Fairphone 3+ by 94.3% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $461. Fairphone 3+ is cheaper by $461.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (96/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (96/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (77/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 74 points (87/100 vs 13/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 13/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 26/100).
Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Fairphone 3+ is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.