ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $899 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 52/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 859,084); the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL is noticeably lighter (240g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 240g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $2899
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 859084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1031
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2864
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 17 points higher (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 53/100). Value score: ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL — 16/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 / ROG UI | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×77.6×9.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 240 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 24MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL by 70.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2000. ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL was $2000 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the ASUS ROG Phone II ZS660KL over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.