Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo X300
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 leads — 81/100 vs 77/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,037,992 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo X300
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3352
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 10402
- Overall rating 77/100
What makes Vivo X300 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3037992 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo X300, the Vivo X300 scores 4 points higher (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 leads (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (78/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo X300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3037992 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3352 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 10402 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 206 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo X300
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 leads Apple iPhone Fold by 16.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (78/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo X300?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 — 81/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X300?
The Vivo X300 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo X300?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.