Apple iPhone Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold (2026) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 56/100 vs 37/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP.
Apple iPhone Fold
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Higher performance (72/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 47/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 19 points higher (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold leads (72/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (72/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (81/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | — | |
| AnTuTu | 2568709 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | — | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | — | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (72/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (81/100 vs 47/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Apple iPhone Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 47/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on performance (72/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.