Apple iPhone 16e vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Apple iPhone 16e (2025) runs on the Apple A18, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $599 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 56/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3279); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,972,476); the Apple iPhone 16e is noticeably lighter (167g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16e
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Apple iPhone 16e better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3254 vs 2833
- Lighter: 167g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1799
- Better portability (80/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1972476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 8070
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3279 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 85/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16e vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 27 points higher (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16e — 26/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (68/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (80/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16e | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1972476 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3254 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8070 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.1" OLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2532x1170 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3279 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16e
- Main: 48MP f/1.6
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16e
- 6.1" OLED
- Resolution: 2532x1170
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16e
- 3279 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- Wireless: 7W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16e and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Apple iPhone 16e by 35.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1200. Apple iPhone 16e was $1200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (81/100 vs 61/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e (68/100 vs 19/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16e notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (80/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16e by 27 points (83/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16e and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16e has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16e or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16e over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.