Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $999 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 59/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,870,000); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 157); the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 285g).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Motorola Razr Fold
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $999 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (41/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1870000
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3400
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 7/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 18 points higher (77/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 7/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (92/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (51/100 vs 7/100). In the "design" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (41/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1870000 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 285 g | |
| Price | $999 | $1799 |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 52.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $800. Apple iPhone 16 Pro is cheaper by $800.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (92/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (51/100 vs 7/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (51/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (41/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.