Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $999 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 73/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,782,199); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 157); the Apple iPhone 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 2833
- Lighter: 199g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1799
- Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1782199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 85/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 24/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 10 points higher (83/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 24/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 Pro — 56/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (68/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1782199 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 41.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $800. Apple iPhone 16 Pro was $800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (68/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.